Certainly, the author should go into enough depth to allow someone to repeat the work. A verbal "road map" or verbal "table of contents" guiding the reader to what lies ahead. However, do not offer recommendations which could have been easily addressed within the study.
Do not be verbose or repetitive Be concise and make your points clearly Avoid using jargon Follow a logical stream of thought; in general, interpret and discuss the significance of your findings in the same sequence you described them in your results section [a notable exception is to begin by highlighting an unexpected result or finding] Use the present verb tense, especially for established facts; however, refer to specific works or prior studies in the past tense If needed, use subheadings to help organize your discussion or to categorize your interpretations into themes II.
While you might have noticed some similarities between the two, they both generally have a different purpose.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Commonly asked questions about ozone. For that reason, a thesis or dissertation written to a multi-disciplinary committee is broader in style than a thesis or dissertation written to a committee within a single discipline.
While a spider diagram encourages you to see connections, a matrix forces you to think about hierarchy. The results section is just a presentation of the data. Based on Writing for Science and Engineering by Silyn Roberts Discuss any contrary results and attempt to explain them.
To look at a sample set of guidelines, see the following examplewhich is for electronic theses and dissertations ETDs at Virginia Tech.
Most important for style is that the writing be both precise and clear. The Content The content of the discussion section of your paper most often includes: We want you to answer a scientific question or hypothesis. Be sure to include a hook at the beginning of the introduction.
However, if your findings raise a lot of new questions or issues, consider including suggestions for further research in the discussion section.
The following strategies can help you draft a good discussion: You must write your abstract last. The last column is a list of subheads.
All theses should include a list of cited works formatted using disciplinary standards. In other words, the main purpose of the thesis or dissertation is to help the student secure the degree.
The third layer of bubbles contained findings from our mud map recorded in the photos on my phone that we thought fell under these themes.
If you decide to combine these two concepts, it is important that you cover all of your required topics in a systematic way. Child Review of ciliary structure and function. Remember that the data are the data: Printed cleanly on white paper. The first time you read something, you will consciously remember some things, but may subconsciously take in other aspects.
A Systematic…6 Jun turning a dissertation into a publication, writing a journal article in. At all times, cultivate creative thinking and make sure you are telling the reader a coherent narrative that is hopefully making them excited about your results.
Try to show both sides of your argument. The discussion chapter is the problem child of the thesis.
The chapter most likely to provoke fear, uncertainty and doubt. Not everyone writes a chapter called “discussion”, but everyone has to do discussiony bits because, well – that’s where the creative magic of the PhD happens. The.
The discussion is a detailed presentation of your findings and provides scientific back-up for your arguments.
It explains your findings and interprets them in context of previous work, as well as provides some suggestions for future research. How to Write A Scientific Thesis Aims. It is important to remember that scientific inquiry is motivated by specific questions and that to write clearly you should have your question at.
Discussion of theses and dissertations in the Writing Guidelines for Engineering and Science Students: guidelines to help students of science and engineering make their writing more efficient for others to read and to make the process of writing more efficient for them to perform.
Scientific prose should be clear, concise, comprehensible (and perhaps, compelling). The 3 Cs is the antidote to edict #1 (that scientific prose should be a narrative construction). The 3 Cs is the antidote to edict #1 (that scientific prose should be a narrative construction).
Results. The results section is the part of the scientific paper around which everything else is built. The introduction describes why the results needed to be obtained, the methods how they were obtained and the discussion explains the results.Thesis discussion scientific